The glow may look healthy, but what happens beneath the surface tells a very different story.
For decades, a golden tan has been associated with holidays, health and looking well. A little colour can make the skin appear brighter, even out its tone and create the impression that we have spent our time outdoors rather than behind a desk. Yet the science tells a very different story.
A tan is not a sign that the skin is healthy. It is the skin’s response to ultraviolet radiation. When exposed to UV rays, the skin produces more melanin as a protective response. In other words, the colour that we like is evidence that the skin has been exposed to damage. The World Health Organization is unequivocal: there is no such thing as a healthy tan.
Why Does Your Skin Tan?
There are two main types of UV radiation that reach the skin: UVA and UVB. They behave differently, but both can cause damage.
UVA penetrates deeper into the skin and contributes significantly to premature ageing. Over time, repeated exposure can affect collagen and elastin, contributing to a loss of elasticity, wrinkles and other visible signs of photoageing. UVB is more strongly associated with sunburn, but it also contributes to tanning and DNA damage.
The important point is that you do not have to burn for UV damage to occur. A tan itself is a biological response to UV exposure.
That is why the idea of a “healthy tan” is misleading. The skin is effectively attempting to defend itself from further radiation.
Does A Tan Protect You From The Sun?
Only to a very limited extent.
The WHO estimates that a UV-induced tan provides the equivalent of approximately SPF 2–4. That offers nowhere near enough protection against continued UV exposure and does not prevent the long-term effects of cumulative radiation.
This is also why the idea of developing a “base tan” before a holiday is flawed. Getting some colour beforehand does not make it safe to spend longer periods in the sun.
A tan may make the skin less likely to redden immediately, but it does not make the underlying biological damage disappear.
The Ageing Questions
For anyone concerned about maintaining healthy-looking skin, this is perhaps the most immediate consequence of regular tanning.
UVA radiation penetrates relatively deeply into the skin and contributes to the breakdown and alteration of structures that help keep skin firm and resilient. Over time, repeated exposure can contribute to wrinkles, uneven pigmentation, loss of elasticity and a generally more weathered appearance. The American Academy of Dermatology specifically recommends avoiding tanning as part of preventing premature skin ageing.
This creates an interesting contradiction in the way we think about tanning. We may deliberately expose ourselves to UV because we like the way it makes our skin look in the short term, while simultaneously accelerating some of the changes we spend considerable amounts of money trying to reverse later.
No serum can completely cancel out years of UV exposure.
Skin Cancer
The cosmetic consequences are only part of the story.
UV radiation is the main environmental cause of skin cancer, and both cumulative exposure and episodes of intense exposure and sunburn contribute to risk. The WHO identifies melanoma, basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma among the cancers associated with UV exposure.
This does not mean that every person who enjoys the sun will develop skin cancer. Risk depends on numerous factors, including skin type, genetics, lifetime UV exposure and patterns of sunburn.
It does mean, however, that deliberately seeking a tan is not a risk-free beauty habit.
People With Darker Skin
The conversation around sun protection is sometimes presented as though UV damage is only a concern for people with very fair skin. That is not accurate.
People with naturally darker skin generally have more melanin and a lower risk of certain UV-related problems than people with very fair skin. However, darker skin can still experience UV damage, including pigmentation changes and skin cancer. The European Code Against Cancer notes that people with darker skin can still burn and should not assume they are immune to the effects of UV exposure.
The amount of protection required may differ between individuals, but the basic principle remains the same: excessive UV exposure is not beneficial to the skin.
Are Sunbeds Better?
No.
If anything, the idea that a sunbed provides a safer way to develop a tan is particularly misleading. Sunbeds deliberately expose the skin to ultraviolet radiation, and the WHO recommends avoiding artificial tanning devices. UV exposure from sunbeds can contribute to DNA damage, premature ageing and skin cancer.
A sunbed tan is still a UV-induced tan. The source of the radiation does not make the biological response healthier.
So Can You Still Have A Tan?
Absolutely, just not necessarily from UV exposure.
Self-tanning products can create a bronzed appearance without deliberately exposing the skin to ultraviolet radiation. The American Academy of Dermatology recommends self-tanner as an alternative for people who want the appearance of a tan, while emphasising that self-tanning products do not replace sunscreen.
That distinction is important. You can have the aesthetic effect without deliberately seeking the UV exposure that causes it.
For days spent outdoors, protection remains important. The AAD recommends broad-spectrum, water-resistant SPF 30 or higher, alongside shade, protective clothing and other sensible measures.
The Bottom Line
There is nothing wrong with enjoying a sunny day. Being outdoors has many benefits, and avoiding the sun entirely is neither realistic nor necessary.
The difference is between enjoying the sun and deliberately trying to tan.
A tan may look healthy, but it is not evidence of healthier skin. It is the visible result of the skin responding to UV radiation. Over time, repeated exposure can accelerate premature ageing and increase the risk of skin cancer.
Perhaps the beauty industry’s relationship with tanning is finally changing. The modern version of a healthy glow does not need to involve damaging the skin to achieve it.
Key Takeaways
- A natural tan is a response to UV exposure and is considered a sign of skin damage.
- A tan provides only very limited protection against further UV radiation.
- UVA contributes to premature skin ageing, while both UVA and UVB can contribute to DNA damage.
- Sunbeds are not a safer alternative to tanning outdoors.
- All skin tones can experience UV damage, although individual risks vary.
- Self-tanning products can provide colour without UV exposure, but they do not replace sunscreen.
- Protecting your skin does not mean avoiding the outdoors — it means being smarter about UV exposure.
Further Reading
The Truth About Walking 10,000 Steps
Stay Connected
Subscribe to the Together Magazine newsletter for thoughtful features, personal development insights, cultural recommendations, museum exhibitions, events in Brussels and Belgium, and the latest stories delivered directly to your inbox.
