Artificial intelligence can already write reports, analyse data, produce images and write computer code. As its capabilities improve, a question is becoming increasingly difficult to ignore: what happens to our jobs?
Not long ago, automation was supposed to threaten factory workers first.
The arrival of generative AI has complicated that assumption. Software can now draft emails, summarise documents, translate languages, analyse spreadsheets, produce presentations, write code and create images in seconds. Suddenly, some of the people wondering about automation aren’t standing on production lines. They’re sitting in offices.
Accountants, lawyers, programmers, designers, translators, analysts, administrators and marketing professionals are all watching AI move into parts of their work.
So how worried should we actually be?
The evidence so far suggests something more complicated than either the utopian or catastrophic version of the AI story. Some jobs will disappear. New ones will emerge. But for a large proportion of workers, the biggest change may be what happens inside the job they already have.
AI is more likely to replace tasks than entire jobs
A job is rarely one activity.
Consider an accountant. The role might involve collecting information, checking documents, preparing calculations, interpreting regulations, communicating with clients and making judgements when circumstances are unusual.
AI may become very good at some of those activities without being capable of performing the entire job.
This distinction between jobs and tasks is crucial.
The International Labour Organization’s latest research estimates that around one in four jobs worldwide has some degree of exposure to generative AI. In high-income countries, the proportion is approximately one in three.
But exposure doesn’t mean that one-third of workers are about to lose their jobs. The ILO stresses that most occupations still contain tasks requiring human involvement. For many workers, AI is therefore more likely to change the composition of their work than eliminate the occupation altogether.
That may mean fewer hours spent drafting routine documents, searching through information or performing repetitive administrative work—and more time spent reviewing, deciding, communicating and handling exceptions.
Office jobs are unusually exposed
Previous waves of automation were strongly associated with physical machinery and repetitive manual work.
Generative AI is different because it operates particularly well in the world of language, information and digital tasks.
That puts white-collar work directly in its path.
The ILO identifies clerical occupations as the most exposed, including data-entry, bookkeeping and administrative roles. But exposure has also increased among more specialised occupations such as financial analysts, programmers and investment advisers as AI systems have become more capable.
In 2026, the ILO cautioned that newer AI exposure measures increasingly identify cognitive, analytical, administrative and managerial occupations as potentially affected.
In other words, having a university degree or an office job doesn’t automatically place someone on the safe side of automation.
In some cases, it may mean the opposite.
But exposure isn’t the same as unemployment
This is where predictions about AI frequently become misleading.
Researchers can estimate whether AI is technically capable of performing tasks within an occupation. Predicting what employers will actually do with that capability is much harder.
A company might use AI to reduce its workforce. Another might use exactly the same technology to increase output while keeping the same number of employees. A third might create entirely new services because AI makes them economically possible.
Cost, regulation, reliability, customer preferences and organisational decisions all matter.
The ILO’s 2026 review of emerging evidence found that productivity improvements from generative AI are real but uneven. So far, however, large-scale employment displacement has remained limited.
That could change as the technology improves and adoption spreads. But it is an important reminder that technical capability doesn’t automatically translate into immediate job losses.
Europe may gain jobs overall, but not everyone will benefit equally
The European picture is particularly relevant for Together readers.
A European Commission analysis published in January 2026 concluded that AI and other emerging digital technologies could increase employment overall in Europe.
That sounds reassuring until you look more closely.
The benefits are not expected to be distributed evenly. The Commission found that high-skilled and prime-age workers are better positioned to benefit, while younger and lower-skilled workers and economically weaker regions may face greater risks without appropriate training and support.
There is another complication.
A European Commission survey conducted in early 2026 found that just over half of Europeans were already using AI in some form, while around one in four was using it at work.
AI has therefore moved beyond being a technology that might affect employment someday.
For millions of Europeans, it is already part of the working day.
The entry-level problem may be particularly important
One of the more uncomfortable questions is what happens to the work people traditionally perform at the beginning of a career.
Junior employees often start with exactly the tasks AI handles increasingly well: researching information, preparing first drafts, creating basic presentations, summarising documents, performing routine analysis and handling administrative work.
Those tasks may not be glamorous, but they serve another purpose. They are how people learn.
If organisations automate large amounts of junior work, they may become more productive in the short term while creating a different problem: where do tomorrow’s experienced workers come from?
The ILO’s latest review identifies the erosion of employment opportunities for younger workers as one of the areas requiring attention as generative AI adoption develops.
The question isn’t simply whether AI can do junior work.
It is what happens to career progression when it does.
Which jobs are safer?
There probably isn’t a useful list of completely “AI-proof” professions.
Technology changes, and occupations change with it.
But certain characteristics are harder to automate comprehensively.
Work involving physical interaction with unpredictable environments remains difficult for purely digital AI systems. So does work built around human relationships, accountability, negotiation, leadership and complex judgement.
That doesn’t mean doctors, managers, teachers or skilled tradespeople won’t use AI. Many almost certainly will.
It means AI may become one of their tools without becoming the entire worker.
The more useful question, therefore, isn’t simply “Can AI do my job?”
It is:
“Which parts of my job can AI do, and which parts become more valuable when it can?”
The skills that may become more valuable
The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, based on responses from more than 1,000 employers representing over 14 million workers, found that AI and big-data skills are among those expected to grow fastest in importance.
But the same employers didn’t predict a future consisting only of technical specialists.
Creative thinking, resilience, flexibility, leadership and social influence remain important.
That makes sense.
When producing information becomes cheap, judging information may become more valuable.
If anyone can generate ten strategies in 30 seconds, the scarce skill becomes knowing which strategy makes sense. If AI can draft an email instantly, understanding what should be said—and what shouldn’t—still matters.
Expertise doesn’t necessarily become worthless when AI becomes capable.
It may change from producing the first answer to evaluating whether the answer is any good.
Learning to use AI may matter more than competing with it
There is a tempting way to think about the future of work: humans on one side, AI on the other.
The workplace is more likely to be messier.
People will increasingly work with AI systems. The difference may therefore emerge not only between jobs that can and cannot be automated, but between workers who learn how to use the technology effectively and those who don’t.
That doesn’t mean everyone needs to become an AI engineer.
It means understanding what these systems are good at, where they fail, how to verify their output and where human judgement remains necessary.
The valuable employee may not be the person who refuses to use AI or the person who blindly trusts it.
It may be the person who knows when to use it.
Will AI make your job obsolete?
For some people, possibly.
It would be unrealistic to pretend that a technology capable of performing increasingly sophisticated work will have no effect on employment. Some occupations will shrink, some tasks will disappear and certain entry-level routes may become more difficult.
But the evidence doesn’t currently support the simpler idea that AI is about to make human work broadly obsolete.
The more immediate change is job transformation.
The World Economic Forum estimates that wider structural changes to the global economy could create 170 million jobs and displace 92 million by 2030. Within that picture, AI and information-processing technologies are expected to contribute to both job creation and job displacement.
Nobody can know precisely what the labour market will look like a decade from now. AI capabilities are moving too quickly, while adoption, regulation and economic conditions remain uncertain.
But waiting to find out isn’t particularly useful either.
The better response is to understand which parts of your work are becoming easier to automate, learn to use the technology that is changing them and invest in the abilities that remain difficult to replicate: judgement, expertise, communication, creativity and responsibility.
AI may not take your job.
But it is increasingly likely to change what your job is.
Further Reading
Best Cafés to Study and Work in Brussels
Stay Connected
Subscribe to the Together Magazine newsletter for thoughtful features, personal development insights, cultural recommendations, museum exhibitions, events in Brussels and Belgium, and the latest stories delivered directly to your inbox.
